Sunday, February 26, 2012
1977 International Flight of Fancy
In Elvis Decoded, a trusted source provided me with information indicating that no international flight tickets were available for purchase at MIA in 1977, but I want to post the response I received recently from a representative of the airport to add further clarity and weight. In a response to my inquiry as to whether an international flight ticket could be purchased at MIA in 1977, the representative stated:
"There were no international flights from Memphis International in 1977."
"An international flight ticket could not be purchased at MIA in 1977. A domestic ticket would have to be purchased which would then connect you to the nearest airport that flies to your international destination."
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Aaron...Spelling - The Final Word
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Ginger Alden Reconsidered
Thursday, June 16, 2011
8/16/77: Ginger Alden Revisited
On August 16, 1977, Ginger Alden (Elvis's fiancée) was with Elvis in his upstairs suite, and at 2:20 that afternoon she found his lifeless body on the floor of the bathroom. Since then, Ginger's actions that day have been described in various ways, most of which are very much at odds with the facts. With Ginger's long-awaited book in the works, I am going to revisit this topic in the hope that by the time the book is published, at least some fans will be able to approach it with a clearer understanding of what really happened that day, and a fairer and more reasonable view of Ginger's involvement in the day's events.
Part I is here.
Part II is here.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Vernon & The Autopsy Permission Form
UPDATE (6/10/11): Further comments on the autopsy permission form from Dr. Nichopoulos, illustrating that it was apparently he who initiated and handled the situation, not Dick Grob:
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Review: The Post Mortem Documents
The Autopsy Report: This report (Postmortem #A77-160) was put together by the Baptist Memorial Hospital pathologists who performed the autopsy. The autopsy report is not a public document; it was prepared for the Presley family and is the property of the Presley family. It is not “under seal,” nor is it, as a private medical record, subject to judicial seal. Because the autopsy report is a private medical record, it will not be released at any time.
The Medical Examiner’s Report: This is the 2-page report signed and submitted by the Shelby County Medical Examiner, Dr. Jerry Francisco. This document is officially titled, “Report of Investigation by County Medical Examiner,” and is designated Case #77-1944. This 2-page report is not the autopsy report.
The Death Certificate: This is the death certificate completed and signed by Dr. Francisco and filed with the state of Tennessee. Per Tennessee statute, death certificates become public documents at the end of a 50-year period, which means this document will be released in 2027. The death certificate, while not available to the public, is not “under seal,” but is simply not a public document based on Tennessee law.
The Permission for Autopsy Form: This is the form (BMH #29-51) signed by Vernon Presley to grant permission for the autopsy. The signing of the form was witnessed by Dr. George C. Nichopoulos and Richard H. Grob.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
The Autopsy Photographer
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Cranial Autopsy - The Body of Evidence
My analysis is linked here.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
"Jesse" Makes A Mistake
“…I chose not to be in the Witness Protection program…”
Here, “Jesse” is playing the aliver version of Elvis, the Elvis that had to escape the dangers that faced him in August 1977. But what this comment really tells us is that whomever is playing the role of “Jesse” in this ridiculous con-game is *NOT* Elvis Presley, because as I outlined in my September 30 post, Elvis never knew about Operation Fountain Pen, nor the specific investigation into the JetStar deal. Thus, he was never a witness. He was never threatened. He was never in any danger. His family was never in any danger. And because of this, the Witness Protection program was never even part of the story. Why would they offer “witness protection” to someone who was never a witness, and knew nothing of the investigation?
If "Jesse" were Elvis, he would know all of this.
To all thinking people, this is a clear and very revealing error made by the con artists playing this ridiculous “Jesse” game.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Monday, November 15, 2010
Deecoded - Dee Presley's Letter
The letter can be found at Elvis Express Radio.
Page 1
I want this stopped immediately.
I am sorry, needless to say as you already know when I put him on notice my plan to seek legal advice and find out who is responsible for the embarrassment and agony this has caused me and my family. It was immediately stopped but I feel the damage [was] already done.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
UPDATES - November 11, 2010
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Pop Odyssey Radio - October 28, 2010
http://popodysseyradio.com/
Friday, October 22, 2010
Dee Stanley's eBook
10/22/10: Against Marty Lacker's sage advice, and against my better judgment, I am now reading the "book" that Dee Stanley put out a few months ago. Really.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
EP & OPFOPEN - A House of Cards?
1. Elvis Presley was not involved in any way with OPFOPEN. In fact, Elvis never knew about OPFOPEN.
2. Vernon Presley did not know about OPFOPEN until after Elvis's death on August 16, 1977, which means that while Elvis was alive, neither Vernon nor Elvis knew of this active FBI investigation.
3. Elvis Presley's life was never in danger due to the OPFOPEN case, nor was he threatened by anyone involved in this case.
These three points are critical in evaluating the many claims pertaining to Elvis's alleged (mythical) role in federal law enforcement, especially in the last year or so of his life.
9/30/10: Elvis fans for years have suggested Elvis was actively involved in the FBI's OPFOPEN case—an acronym for the FBI’s international undercover case called, “Operation Fountain Pen”—and in 1977 he was in fear for his life. The claims, stories, and myths are numerous and the tales of intrigue never-ending.
But is the story true? Did Elvis help Bureau undercover agents pursue certain Organized Crime and White-Collar-Crime figures determined to use “offshore banks” and “bogus” securities to bring about economic havoc here, in the United States, and abroad? Was Elvis working behind the scenes on the JetStar deal gone awry? Speaking with the retired FBI agent who initiated and worked undercover on the OPFOPEN case, the short answer is "No." But, he said, there are details Elvis fans might be interested in learning.
Monday, September 27, 2010
UPDATE: Aaron...Spelling, Part II
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Alice McFarland and Fox 8 News
Thursday, June 17, 2010
January, 1978: The Poolhouse
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Updates...
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
The Billy Stanley Set-Up
Was Billy Stanley really set up, as he claims, or is there another explanation? My commentary on this question is posted here.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Rejected: The Lloyds of London Insurance Claim
One of the standard "go-to" pieces of evidence the alivers use to prove/support the death hoax is the Lloyds of London insurance policy, which they claim was purchased but never cashed/paid out. Thus, they reason, the insurance policy supports the hoaxed death theory since Elvis and the estate would be guilty of insurance fraud if the policy had been paid out.
First, this policy was never purchased.
Second, this theory ignores the fact that Elvis Presley and his family had multiple insurance policies that would have been affected upon Elvis’s death. Or, are we to believe that one the biggest earners in the entertainment industry had just one insurance policy? Really? Just one?
Finally, this piece of evidence, like so many other pieces of evidence offered up by the alivers, is researched only so far as it supports their death hoax theory. Once they decide a fact supports their theory, they stop researching. In this case, someone (who?) reports that a life insurance policy is still active, and well, that’s good enough for them. No research into whether the policy was purchased. No research into who reported that a life insurance policy was purchased. No research into how this information was obtained (since insurers closely protect customers’ medical and insurance information). No research into other insurance policies, and whether they were cashed or are still active.
Nothing.
To make a long story short, the estate deposited a lump sum death benefit check from the United States Treasury on February 21, 1978. This eliminates the "Lloyds of London" theory the alivers use to support a death hoax, since this check represents a financial benefit for the estate as a direct result of the death.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Delusions: 74
Several questions come to mind when contemplating this title page with these two signatures, and the "age 74" notation:
Since when does a celebrity, in the course of signing an autograph, also write his or her age? Has anyone seen an autograph from George Clooney that reads, "George Clooney age 48"? What about an autograph from Julia Roberts, signed, "Julia Roberts age 42"? Does the person who signed the name "Jesse Presley" and wrote "age 74" think that those people who have not already been indoctrinated into the strange labyrinth constructed by "the true believers" might somehow be convinced of the signature’s authenticity based on this "age 74" notation? That is, if the "age 74" note were not there, would there be some suspicion or question as to the identity of the signer? But that by adding "age 74," that suspicion would be alleviated, and the uninitiated would then conclude, "Oh, it says 'age 74' right here next to 'Jesse Presley,' so that means it had to have been signed by Elvis Presley, since Elvis would have been 74 years old when this signature was made." Is this "age 74" notation actually intended to convince people of the authenticity of these signatures?
Really now, how stupid, how gullible, how naïve, and how ignorant does the character of "Jesse" think people are? Does he/she really believe that "age 74" would be enough to change someone’s mind about this whole "Jesse" scheme?
Finally, "Jesse," whom we are told is really Elvis Presley, writes in the Hinton book that Elvis died in 1977, and that at the time of Elvis’s death, "Jesse" came to life. If that is the case, then why did “Jesse” write that he is 74? Shouldn’t the note have read, "age 32"?
Enquiring minds...











